Directory · Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4.1 mini

Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.

Gemini 3.7 Flash profile → GPT-4.1 mini profile →

Tale of the tape

Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.

Metric	Gemini 3.7 Flash	GPT-4.1 mini
Input cost / 1M	$0.75	$0.40
Output cost / 1M	$3.75	$1.60
Context window	1,048,576 tokens	1,047,576 tokens
MMLU score	—	—

Cost verdict

Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.

Monthly input tokens, in millions Monthly output tokens, in millions

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Input: 1M × $0.75 = $0.75; Output: 1M × $3.75 = $3.75
Total: $4.50

GPT-4.1 mini

Input: 1M × $0.40 = $0.40; Output: 1M × $1.60 = $1.60
Total: $2.00

Total cost savings

$2.50

GPT-4.1 mini saves $2.50 per month vs the other model at this volume.

Model routing savings

Uses this page's verified rates. Gemini 3.7 Flash is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); GPT-4.1 mini handles routine traffic.

Premium model

Gemini 3.7 Flash

$0.75 in · $3.75 out / 1M

View profile →

Economical model

GPT-4.1 mini

$0.40 in · $1.60 out / 1M

View profile →

Monthly input tokens (millions) Monthly output tokens (millions)

All premium

Gemini 3.7 Flash

$225.00

100% of input and output on the premium route

Routed stack

80% → GPT-4.1 mini

20% → Gemini 3.7 Flash

$125.00

Routine slice: $80.00
Premium slice: $45.00

Monthly savings

$100.00

44.4% lower

Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (gemini-3-7-flash, gpt-4-1-mini) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.

Related comparisons

More head-to-head model matchups.