Directory · Model comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Mistral Small 4
Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.
Tale of the tape
Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.
| Metric | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Mistral Small 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Input cost / 1M | $0.44 | $0.15 |
| Output cost / 1M | $1.32 | $0.60 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | — |
| MMLU score | — | — |
Cost verdict
Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- Input: 1M × $0.44 = $0.44
- Output: 1M × $1.32 = $1.32
- Total
- $1.76
Mistral Small 4
- Input: 1M × $0.15 = $0.15
- Output: 1M × $0.60 = $0.60
- Total
- $0.75
Total cost savings
$1.01
Mistral Small 4 saves $1.01 per month vs the other model at this volume.
Model routing savings
Uses this page's verified rates. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); Mistral Small 4 handles routine traffic.
All premium
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
$88.00
100% of input and output on the premium route
Routed stack
80% → Mistral Small 4
20% → DeepSeek-V4-Flash
$47.60
- Routine slice
- $30.00
- Premium slice
- $17.60
Monthly savings
$40.40
45.9% lower
Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (deepseek-v4-flash, mistral-small-4) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.
Related comparisons
More head-to-head model matchups.