Directory · Model comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B vs Qwen3.7-Plus
Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.
Tale of the tape
Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.
| Metric | Qwen3-235B-A22B | Qwen3.7-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Input cost / 1M | $0.70 | $0.40 |
| Output cost / 1M | $2.80 | $1.60 |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| MMLU score | — | — |
Cost verdict
Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- Input: 1M × $0.70 = $0.70
- Output: 1M × $2.80 = $2.80
- Total
- $3.50
Qwen3.7-Plus
- Input: 1M × $0.40 = $0.40
- Output: 1M × $1.60 = $1.60
- Total
- $2.00
Total cost savings
$1.50
Qwen3.7-Plus saves $1.50 per month vs the other model at this volume.
Model routing savings
Uses this page's verified rates. Qwen3-235B-A22B is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); Qwen3.7-Plus handles routine traffic.
All premium
Qwen3-235B-A22B
$175.00
100% of input and output on the premium route
Routed stack
80% → Qwen3.7-Plus
20% → Qwen3-235B-A22B
$115.00
- Routine slice
- $80.00
- Premium slice
- $35.00
Monthly savings
$60.00
34.3% lower
Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (qwen3-235b-a22b, qwen3-7-plus) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.
Related comparisons
More head-to-head model matchups.