Directory · Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct
Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.
Tale of the tape
Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input cost / 1M | $0.95 | $1.50 |
| Output cost / 1M | $4.00 | $7.50 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| MMLU score | — | — |
Cost verdict
Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.
Kimi K2.7 Code
- Input: 1M × $0.95 = $0.95
- Output: 1M × $4.00 = $4.00
- Total
- $4.95
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct
- Input: 1M × $1.50 = $1.50
- Output: 1M × $7.50 = $7.50
- Total
- $9.00
Total cost savings
$4.05
Kimi K2.7 Code saves $4.05 per month vs the other model at this volume.
Model routing savings
Uses this page's verified rates. Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); Kimi K2.7 Code handles routine traffic.
All premium
Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct
$450.00
100% of input and output on the premium route
Routed stack
80% → Kimi K2.7 Code
20% → Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B-Instruct
$288.00
- Routine slice
- $198.00
- Premium slice
- $90.00
Monthly savings
$162.00
36% lower
Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (qwen3-coder-480b-a35b, kimi-k2-7-code) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.
Related comparisons
More head-to-head model matchups.