Directory · Model comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.

Kimi K2.7 Code profile → Qwen3.7-Plus profile →

Tale of the tape

Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.

Metric	Kimi K2.7 Code	Qwen3.7-Plus
Input cost / 1M	$0.95	$0.40
Output cost / 1M	$4.00	$1.60
Context window	262,144 tokens	1,000,000 tokens
MMLU score	—	—

Cost verdict

Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.

Monthly input tokens, in millions Monthly output tokens, in millions

Kimi K2.7 Code

Input: 1M × $0.95 = $0.95; Output: 1M × $4.00 = $4.00
Total: $4.95

Qwen3.7-Plus

Input: 1M × $0.40 = $0.40; Output: 1M × $1.60 = $1.60
Total: $2.00

Total cost savings

$2.95

Qwen3.7-Plus saves $2.95 per month vs the other model at this volume.

Model routing savings

Uses this page's verified rates. Kimi K2.7 Code is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); Qwen3.7-Plus handles routine traffic.

Premium model

Kimi K2.7 Code

$0.95 in · $4.00 out / 1M

View profile →

Economical model

Qwen3.7-Plus

$0.40 in · $1.60 out / 1M

View profile →

Monthly input tokens (millions) Monthly output tokens (millions)

All premium

Kimi K2.7 Code

$247.50

100% of input and output on the premium route

Routed stack

80% → Qwen3.7-Plus

20% → Kimi K2.7 Code

$129.50

Routine slice: $80.00
Premium slice: $49.50

Monthly savings

$118.00

47.7% lower

Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (kimi-k2-7-code, qwen3-7-plus) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.

Related comparisons

More head-to-head model matchups.