Directory · Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.7-Plus

Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.

Grok Build 0.1 profile → Qwen3.7-Plus profile →

Tale of the tape

Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.

Metric	Grok Build 0.1	Qwen3.7-Plus
Input cost / 1M	$1.00	$0.40
Output cost / 1M	$2.00	$1.60
Context window	256,000 tokens	1,000,000 tokens
MMLU score	—	—

Cost verdict

Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.

Monthly input tokens, in millions Monthly output tokens, in millions

Grok Build 0.1

Input: 1M × $1.00 = $1.00; Output: 1M × $2.00 = $2.00
Total: $3.00

Qwen3.7-Plus

Input: 1M × $0.40 = $0.40; Output: 1M × $1.60 = $1.60
Total: $2.00

Total cost savings

$1.00

Qwen3.7-Plus saves $1.00 per month vs the other model at this volume.

Model routing savings

Uses this page's verified rates. Grok Build 0.1 is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); Qwen3.7-Plus handles routine traffic.

Premium model

Grok Build 0.1

$1.00 in · $2.00 out / 1M

View profile →

Economical model

Qwen3.7-Plus

$0.40 in · $1.60 out / 1M

View profile →

Monthly input tokens (millions) Monthly output tokens (millions)

All premium

Grok Build 0.1

$150.00

100% of input and output on the premium route

Routed stack

80% → Qwen3.7-Plus

20% → Grok Build 0.1

$110.00

Routine slice: $80.00
Premium slice: $30.00

Monthly savings

$40.00

26.7% lower

Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (grok-build-0-1, qwen3-7-plus) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.

Related comparisons

More head-to-head model matchups.