Directory · Model comparison
Grok 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.
Tale of the tape
Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Input cost / 1M | $2.00 | $1.50 |
| Output cost / 1M | $6.00 | $7.50 |
| Context window | 500,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| MMLU score | — | — |
Cost verdict
Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.
Grok 4.6
- Input: 1M × $2.00 = $2.00
- Output: 1M × $6.00 = $6.00
- Total
- $8.00
Mistral Medium 3.5
- Input: 1M × $1.50 = $1.50
- Output: 1M × $7.50 = $7.50
- Total
- $9.00
Total cost savings
$1.00
Grok 4.6 saves $1.00 per month vs the other model at this volume.
Model routing savings
Uses this page's verified rates. Mistral Medium 3.5 is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); Grok 4.6 handles routine traffic.
All premium
Mistral Medium 3.5
$450.00
100% of input and output on the premium route
Routed stack
80% → Grok 4.6
20% → Mistral Medium 3.5
$410.00
- Routine slice
- $320.00
- Premium slice
- $90.00
Monthly savings
$40.00
8.9% lower
Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (mistral-medium-3-5, grok-4-6) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.
Related comparisons
More head-to-head model matchups.