Directory · Model comparison
GLM-5.2 vs Grok Build 0.1
Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.
Tale of the tape
Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input cost / 1M | $1.40 | $1.00 |
| Output cost / 1M | $4.40 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| MMLU score | — | — |
Cost verdict
Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.
GLM-5.2
- Input: 1M × $1.40 = $1.40
- Output: 1M × $4.40 = $4.40
- Total
- $5.80
Grok Build 0.1
- Input: 1M × $1.00 = $1.00
- Output: 1M × $2.00 = $2.00
- Total
- $3.00
Total cost savings
$2.80
Grok Build 0.1 saves $2.80 per month vs the other model at this volume.
Model routing savings
Uses this page's verified rates. GLM-5.2 is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); Grok Build 0.1 handles routine traffic.
All premium
GLM-5.2
$290.00
100% of input and output on the premium route
Routed stack
80% → Grok Build 0.1
20% → GLM-5.2
$178.00
- Routine slice
- $120.00
- Premium slice
- $58.00
Monthly savings
$112.00
38.6% lower
Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (glm-5-2, grok-build-0-1) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.
Related comparisons
More head-to-head model matchups.