Directory · Model comparison
Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.
Tale of the tape
Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input cost / 1M | $5.00 | $0.44 |
| Output cost / 1M | $25.00 | $1.32 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| MMLU score | — | — |
Cost verdict
Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.
Claude Opus 5
- Input: 1M × $5.00 = $5.00
- Output: 1M × $25.00 = $25.00
- Total
- $30.00
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- Input: 1M × $0.44 = $0.44
- Output: 1M × $1.32 = $1.32
- Total
- $1.76
Total cost savings
$28.24
DeepSeek-V4-Flash saves $28.24 per month vs the other model at this volume.
Model routing savings
Uses this page's verified rates. Claude Opus 5 is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); DeepSeek-V4-Flash handles routine traffic.
All premium
Claude Opus 5
$1,500.00
100% of input and output on the premium route
Routed stack
80% → DeepSeek-V4-Flash
20% → Claude Opus 5
$370.40
- Routine slice
- $70.40
- Premium slice
- $300.00
Monthly savings
$1,129.60
75.3% lower
Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (claude-opus-5, deepseek-v4-flash) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.
Related comparisons
More head-to-head model matchups.