Directory · Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528
Side-by-side API economics and benchmarks. Per-1M input and output rates, context window, and verified metrics.
Tale of the tape
Head-to-head specs pulled from each model profile.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek-R1-0528 |
|---|---|---|
| Input cost / 1M | $1.00 | $0.50 |
| Output cost / 1M | $5.00 | $2.15 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 163,840 tokens |
| MMLU score | — | — |
Cost verdict
Enter monthly input and output volumes to see total cost savings.
Claude Haiku 4.5
- Input: 1M × $1.00 = $1.00
- Output: 1M × $5.00 = $5.00
- Total
- $6.00
DeepSeek-R1-0528
- Input: 1M × $0.50 = $0.50
- Output: 1M × $2.15 = $2.15
- Total
- $2.65
Total cost savings
$3.35
DeepSeek-R1-0528 saves $3.35 per month vs the other model at this volume.
Model routing savings
Uses this page's verified rates. Claude Haiku 4.5 is the premium route (higher combined per-1M cost); DeepSeek-R1-0528 handles routine traffic.
All premium
Claude Haiku 4.5
$300.00
100% of input and output on the premium route
Routed stack
80% → DeepSeek-R1-0528
20% → Claude Haiku 4.5
$166.00
- Routine slice
- $106.00
- Premium slice
- $60.00
Monthly savings
$134.00
44.7% lower
Rates pulled from this page's model database entries (claude-haiku-4-5, deepseek-r1) — same per-1M input/output figures as Tale of the tape. Production routing needs quality gates and monitoring.
Related comparisons
More head-to-head model matchups.